لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله Today is 6th December the day that marks the Shuhada of Babri Masjid 28 years ago and Muslims are still hopelessly running in courts of mushrikoons for "Justice" that will only be achieved by Jihad Fisabilillah
And funny enough there is no historical proof of "Ram" or the existence of his kingdom. It is purely based on mythical folklore According to R P Tripathi, professor of ancient history at Allahabad University, "History requires concrete evidence in the form of coins,
inscriptions, etc to prove the existence of a character. Even if we take into account places mentioned in the Ramayana like Chitrakoot, Ayodhya, which still exist, the fact is that Ramayana is not a historical text.
Having said that, we still cannot negate Ram's presence easily, since he has been a part of our collective consciousness for a long time."
In short "Ram" is a Mythical Folklore that actually has Buddhist Roots in it which we will get to it very soon
"In fact, it is precisely because of this, that we cannot look at Ram objectively, since he has made the transition from being simply a character in an epic to a religious figure," says S Settar, former chairman of the Indian Council of Historical Research
Does that mean that they all existed?" he asks. So, are all mythical texts just that — only myth? Or, is there, somewhere, a grain of truth in them?" Myths have to be carefully interpreted to find that grain of truth. In Ramayana's case,
there is no evidence to prove that it is anything else except a myth. There is also no evidence — either historical or archaeological — which proves that Ram ever existed or that he ruled Ayodhya," claims Settar.
However, there are some who beg to differ. "If archaeology cannot prove whether a temple existed at Ayodhya or a mosque just 500 years ago, what help can it render in establishing historical events more than 7,000 years ago?" asks Pushkar Bhatanagar, author of the book,
Dating The Era Of Lord Ram. "If the masons of those times failed to construct buildings which could survive seven millennia, an inference should not be drawn that the country had no inhabitants at that time or that Ram is a myth," he adds.
However, history requires substantial evidence that can satisfy all academics, says R S Bisht, former Jt DG of the ASI. "Historical evidence has been found about such personalities as Ashoka, who left behind edicts. Unless similar evidence is found about personalities like Ram,
it will be difficult to prove their existence," he says.
And if this Drama of turning myth into a Spearhead of Fanaticism and Propaganda was not enough On 14th July of 2020 Nepal's Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Oli said that 'real Ayodhya' - that is the birthplace of Lord Ram is in Nepal
He was quoted by Nepali media saying that Lord Ram is Nepali and India has encroached upon the cultural heritage of Nepal by setting up 'fake Ayodhya', Nepali media reported
And when we thought Shit won't go more South hill Well it did
Just a day later After Nepalese Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli’s controversial claims on 'real Ayodhya' being in Nepal, a group of Buddhists have now demanded the district administration for a UNESCO-monitored excavation of the Ramjanmabhoomi (RJB) premises.
Two Buddhist monks, who reached Ayodhya from East Champaran in Bihar, launched a hunger strike near the office of District Magistrate of Ayodhya, claiming that the Ram Janmabhoomi complex was basically a Buddhist site.
As per the sources in Ayodhya, Azad Bauddh Dhamma Sena chief Bhanteya Buddha Sharan Kesariya claimed that the remains of an ancient temple found at the Ram Janmabhoomi premises during the levelling of land in May indicated that Ayodhya was once the ancient Buddhist city of
Saket, which was established by Kaushal Naresh Raja Prasenjit in memory of the sage Lomash Rishi.
However Varma, a professor of archaeology at Jawaharlal Nehru University, spoke to Huffington Post about why she thinks the ASI reached the results it did and the procedural lapses she observed. She argues that, “even today, there is no archeological evidence that there was a
temple under the Babri Masjid.” According to her, “Underneath the Babri Masjid, there are actually older mosques.”
Varma has also told Huffington Post that the ASI used three pieces of evidence – all questionable – to say that a temple had existed at the site. A western wall: “The western wall is a feature of a mosque. It is a wall in front of which you say namaaz. It is not the feature of a
temple. Temple has a very different plan.” Fifty pillar bases: “These are completely fabricated and we filed many complaints to the court about it. Our argument is that if you look at what they are claiming to be pillar bases, these are pieces of broken
bricks and they have mud inside them.” Architectural fragments: “Of these 12 [most important architectural fragments], none of these were found during the excavation. These were recovered from the debris lying above the lime floor of the masjid. … A temple, a stone temple –
supposedly this is a stone temple – has much more sculptured material than what they have found.”
Varma also spoke about older excavations around the Babri Masjid area. The first was in 1861 by Alexander Cunningham, the first director-general of the ASI. He had, she claimed, mentioned three mounds in Ayodhya, two with some sort of Buddhist stupas and one with a vihara.
While he banked on oral narratives that indicated some temples in the area had been destroyed, Varma says there was no mention of that in his report.
Between 1975 and 1980, B.B. Lal, the then director-general of the ASI, revived the project. Lal’s work is significant in the history of the area, even though his initial report did not add much to previous work.
So what makes his project stand out? According to Varma (lightly edited for clarity), By 1988, the [Vishwa Hindu Parishad] had picked up this whole issue of temples having been demolished at three sites – Ayodhya, Mathura and Varanasi. In [that year], B.B. Lal took a photograph
of pillar bases, which he said was taken and excavated at Ayodhya between 1975 and 1978, and published it in Manthan, which is the [Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh] journal. He also presented the photograph at the World Archeological Congress in Croatia, saying that if excavations
were to be carried out, they would find evidence of a temple. Thus only in 1975 the Hindu Mushrikoon decided to plot a Deep Conspiracy to wipe out India's Islamic Past like they did with India's Buddhist Past with Success
Lal’s assertions helped the BJP create a large-scale political movement out of the Babri Masjid monument, and in 1992, the mosque was demolished. In 1999, after the National Democratic Alliance assumed power, the topic of excavation became big again, according to Varma, and the
Allahabad high court ordered the ASI dig in 2002.But little did they knew it will become a theater of a Long Historical Rivalry between Hindus themselves in the Race for historic legitimacy that will once again be Challenged by Buddhist and to some extent Shia Mushrikoon
And this is where the roots of Ram being a Buddhist folklore comes in Enter Dasaratha Jataka Katha -461
Once upon a time, at Benares, a great king named Dasaratha renounced the ways of evil, and reigned in righteousness. Of his sixteen thousand wives, the eldest and queen-consort bore him two sons and a daughter; the elder son was named Rama-pandita, or Rama the Wise, the second
was named Prince Lakkhana, or Lucky, and the daughter’s name was the Lady Sita.
In course of time, the queen-consort died. At her death the king was for a long time crushed by sorrow, but urged by his courtiers he performed her obsequies, and set another in her place as queen-consort. She was dear to the king and beloved. In time she also conceived, and all
due attention having been given her, she brought forth a son, and they named him Prince Bharata. The king loved his son much, and said to the queen, “
Lady, I offer you a boon : choose.” She accepted the offer, but put it off for the time. When the lad was seven years old, she went to the king, and said to him, ” My lord, you promised a boon for my son. Will you give it me now?” “Choose, lady,” said he. “My lord,” quoth she,
” give my son the kingdom.” The king snapt his fingers at her; “Out, vile jade!” said he angrily, “my other two sons shine like blazing fires ; would you kill them, and ask the kingdom for a son of yours ?
” She fled in terror to her magnificent chamber, and on other days again and again asked the king the same. The king would not give her this gift. He thought within himself: “Women are ungrateful and treacherous. This woman might use a forged letter or a treacherous bribe to get
my sons murdered.” So he sent for his sons, and told them all about it, saying :
” My sons, if you live here some mischief may befall you. Go to some neighbouring kingdom, or to the woodland, and when my body is burnt, then return and inherit the kingdom which belongs to your family.” Then he summoned soothsayers, and asked them the limits of his own life.
They told him he would live yet twelve years longer. Then he said, ” Now, my sons, after twelve years you must return, and uplift the umbrella of royalty.” They promised, and after taking leave of their father, went forth from the palace weeping. The Lady Sita said, “
I too will go with my brothers” : she bade her father farewell, and went forth weeping. These three departed amidst a great company of people. They sent the people back, and proceeded until at last they came to Himalaya. There in a spot wellwatered, and convenient for the
getting of wild fruits, they built a hermitage, and there lived, feeding upon the wild fruits.Lakkhana-pandita and Sita said to Rama-pandita, ” You are in place of a father to us; remain then in the hermitage, and we will bring fruits, and feed you.” He agreed: thenceforward Rama
pandita stayed where he was, the others brought the fruits and fed him. Thus they lived there, feeding upon the wild fruit; but King Dasaratha pined after his sons, and died in the ninth year. When his obsequies were performed, the queen gave orders that the umbrella should be
over her son, Prince Bharata. But the courtiers said, “The lords of the umbrella are dwelling in the forest, and they would not allow it.” Said Prince Bharata,” I will fetch back my brother Rama-pandita from the forest, and raise the royal umbrella over him.”
Taking the five emblems of royalty, he proceeded with a complete host of the four arms to their dwelling-place. Not far away he caused camp to be pitched, and then with a few courtiers he visited the hermitage, at the time when Lakkhana-pandita and Sita were away in the woods.
At the door of the hermitage sat Rama-pandita,undismayed and at ease, like a figure of fine gold firmly set. The prince approached him with a greeting, and standing on one side, told him of all that had happened in the kingdom, and falling at his feet along with the courtiers,
burst into weeping. Rama-pandita neither sorrowed nor wept; he shewed no change of feeling. When Bharata had finished weeping, and sat down, towards evening the other two returned with wild fruits. Rama-pandita thought-”
” These two are young: all-comprehensive wisdom like mine is not theirs. If they are told on a sudden that our father is dead, the pain will be greater than they can bear, and who knows but their hearts may break. I will find a device to persuade them to go down into the water,
and then tell them the news.” Then pointing out to them a place in front where there was water, he said, ” You have been out too long : let this be your penancego into that water, and stand there.” Then he repeated a half-stanza: Let Lakkhana and Sita both into that pond descend
One word sufficed, into the water they went, and stood there. Then he told them the news by repeating the other half-stanza : Bharata says, king- Dasaratha’s life is at an end. When they heard the news of their father’s death, they fainted. Again he repeated it, again they
they fainted, and when even a third time they fainted away, the courtiers raised them and brought them out of the water, and set them upon dry ground. When they had been comforted, they all sat weeping and wailing together. Then Prince Bharata thought: “Mv brother Prince Lakkhana
and my sister the Lady Sita, cannot restrain their grief to hear of our father’s death ; but Rama-pandita neither wails nor weeps. I wonder what can the reason be that he grieves not ? I will ask.” Then he repeated the second stanza, asking the question : Say by what power thou
grievest not, Kama, when grief should be? Though it is said thy sire is dead grief overwhelms not thee! Then Ram a-pandita explained the reason of his not grieving by saying,
When man can never keep a thing, though loudly he may cry, Why should a wise intelligence torment itself thereby? The young in years, the older grown, the fool, and eke the wise, for rich, for poor one end is sure: each man among them dies. As sure as for the ripened fruit there
conies the fear of fall, So surely comes the fear of death to mortals one and all. Who in the morning light are seen by evening oft are gone, And seen at evening time, is gone by morning many a one. If to a fool infatuate a blessing could accrue when he torments himself with
tears, the wise this same would do. By this tormenting of himself he waxes thin and pale; This cannot bring the dead to life, and nothing tears avail. Even as a blazing house may be put out with water, so The strong, the wise, the intelligent, who well the scriptures know,
Scatter their grief like cotton when the stormy winds do blow. One mortal dies to kindred ties born is another straight : Each creature’s bliss dependent is on ties associate. The strong man therefore, skilled in sacred text, Keen-contemplating this world and the next, Knowing
nature, not by any grief, However great, in mind and heart is vext. So to my kindred I will give, them will I keep and feed, All that remain I will maintain: such is the wise man’s deed. In these stanzas he explained the Impermanence of things. When the company heard this
discourse of Ramapandita, illustrating the doctrine of Impermanence, they lost all their grief. Then Prince Bharata saluted Ramapandita, begging him to receive the kingdom of Benares. “Brother,” said Rama, “take Lakkhana and Sita with you, and administer the kingdom yourselves.”
“No, my lord, you take it.” “Brother, my father commanded me to receive the kingdom at the end of twelve years. If I go now, I shall not carry out his bidding-. After three more years I will come.” ” Who will carry on the government all that time?” ” You do it.”
“I will not.” ” Then until I come, these slippers shall do it,” said Rama, and doffing his slippers of straw he gave them to his brother. So these three persons took the slippers, and bidding the wise man farewell, went to Benares with their great crowd of followers. For three
years the slippers ruled the kingdom. The courtiers placed these straw slippers upon the royal throne, when they judged a cause. If the cause were decided wrongly, the slippers beat upon each other, and at that sign it was examined again; when the decision was right, the slippers
lay quiet. When the three years were over, the wise man came out of the forest, and came to Benares, and entered the park. The princes hearing of his arrival proceeded with a great company to the park, and making Sita the queen consort, gave to them both the ceremonial sprinkling
The sprinkling thus performed, the Great Being, standing in a magnificent chariot, and surrounded by a vast company, entered the city, making a solemn circuit right wise; then mounting to the great terrace of his splendid palace Sucandaka, he reigned there in righteousness for
many years. Before we proceed note that Dasaratha Jataka Katha itself is a Set of folklore and moral tales akin to Aesop's Fables and Buddhism in it's antiquity is Atheistic and doesn't worship God So even by judging by it's original Source Ram is ultimately a Fiction
So the question is why was Babri demolished for the so called "Ramjanmabhoomi" and why are Hindus and Buddhists rekindled their long historic rivalry over a Muslim Architecture???? To gain Legitimacy in writing their own version of History and to Overall wipe out India's Muslim
Heritage.
For Hindu Mushrikoon it is a Failed attempt to rewrite history in order to cope with their inferior complexity for Only Muslims Buddhists and Christians managed to unify Subcontinent and leave a Legacy Hindus can only dream of
For Buddhist Mushrikoon it is an act of Vengence against their Hindu Counterparts for the Total Wipe out of Buddhism by tyrannical Hindu Rulers and Priests As Br.Ambedhkar said "The history of India is nothing but a history of a mortal conflict between Bhramanism and
Buddhism."{Br.Ambedhkar: writings and speeches, volume 03 and page 267}
For Shia it is another backstabbing of Muslim Ummah being the Snakes they are.
But for Muslims It is a Wake up call that Vibrates from Call to Ghazwatul Sindh by a Captured Sister to Hajjaj and Qasim to Moihuddin Chisti Ajmeri's call to Muhammad Gayith ud din Ghor to invade Pitthiraj Chauhan's Kingdom to Shah Waliullah's Letter to Ahmed Shah Durrani
to decimate the Marathas to Ahmed Shah Braelly's call of Jihad against Sikhs. This is the Wake up call for Ghazwatul Hind. The battle of Faiths and Souls. The Battle to Wipe out every Mushriks from Hind Once and for all
#BabriMasjidAwaitsJustice #BabriYaadRahegi #BabriMasjidDemolition #AyodhyaRamMandir #RambhoomiIsBuddhist #Rambhoomi #babrimasjid
