Referring to the recent discussions on here regarding OnlyFans, one must remember the eternal law of the prostitute. It is a law that in its purity and logic can be described as a thing of elegance: the more unsatisfying the experience for you, the more satisfying it is for her.
To paraphrase Arthur C Clarke's famous quote, modern technology is a form of magic that is merely understood. The ability to conjure up erotic images with just the wiggle of a finger would have seemed like dark magic to our ancestors. And all magical acts have consequences.
But there is a deeper magic than the summoning of nudity. The real magic is not with the coomer, but with the prostitute: the ease with which instant money can be summoned without having to do any real labour. It is something akin to alchemy.
And once the prostitute discovers the secret of alchemy, those enrapturing numbers that fall into her bank account in exchange for a few minutes of fingering herself are more erotic than any kind of sex.
It is in this manner that the world’s two most tangible pleasures - sex and money - combine with each other to form an even greater and more addictive pleasure: power. And once you attain a taste for power, there is no going back.
Once sex and money bind in this powerful chemical reaction, when sex is monetized and money eroticized, they can never be seperated. For the prostitute, money doesn’t debase sex; it improves it. Sex-for-pay "liberates" her through its power to corrupt.
When such a stage is reached, the traditional gender roles are flipped, and it is for this reason that many third-wave femininists claim sex-work is so empowering for women. For in the world of OnlyFans, it is men, not women, who are seduced and conquered.
Becoming a prostitute is still - for now - mostly seen as something shameful. Women are by nature the sex most susceptible to societal and peer pressure, so the pressure weighs down heavily on her, upsetting her mental balance.
Yet when the e-thot receives her first monetary payment, the newly found power - probably the first time she has ever tasted power in her life - punctures and destroys all the burden of guilt: the nasty guilt she carries over letting society, her family, and herself down morally.
A new self is born. Being a prostitute becomes her identity. That doesn't absolve her status in the eyes of others, but for many it is enough to satisfy their own internal balance. She is now "living her best life" and attaining power through the magical recipe of sex and money.
And with power comes cruelty. Freed of the burden of being “normal”, she can now indulge her worst feelings; feelings that arise from the negativity and humiliation that her external world still tries to shame her with. For despite being reborn, a woman is still a social animal.
She reflects these attitudes back in mocking form over those that she has power over - her male conquests - and slowly takes a perverse satisfaction that she sees the source of her money and power as losers and simps.
So it is that the law of the prostitute arises: the more unsatisfying her clients, the happier she becomes. The state, of course is happy to facilitate such a process as it wishes to monetise it, as capitalism wishes to monetise all once-free social transactions.
This is why it goes without saying that any right-thinking man should think twice before wifing up an OnlyFans girl. Even being an e-girl on Twitter or Instagram provides enough simp-fuelled dopamine to bring out some of the tendencies I've outlined above. Coomer emptor!
The above process, combined with capitalism's concurrent desire to monetize interactions between the genders, transforms the prostitute not into an amorous provider of sexual services, but into something closer to a gatekeeper or bureaucrat.
The disgruntled petty bureaucrat operates under the expectation that they must provide you with a service, but whose own small taste of power and inferiority complex means that they do so begrudgingly. Their power over infuriating you with admin is their only joy.
Likewise the modern prostitute, as a gatekeeper to the only sexual services that a lot of simps and incels can ever expect, revels in leaving her customers unsatisfied. Not only does this increase her feelings of power, but it often leaves her clients unfulfilled and wanting more
Sex, and the selling of sex, thus becomes a societal transaction on the same level as applying for a driving license or planning permission. Monetized, audited, and given a veneer of respectability despite the contempt of most free-thinking people: the petty bureaucrat wh*re.
The family is the last bastion of opposition to a society accelerating towards anonymous, cold-faced, technocracy. It is the only fortress against a world plunging head-first into endless transactional bureaucracy with zero sincerity, compassion or passion.
So you do not want to bring into your family somebody who through their own lust for power and algorithmic incentives has transformed into a cruel robot that is no better than a DMV employee who gives the occasional handjob. Don't invite the vampire in.
The above phrase "Coomer Emptor!" should of course be "Caveat Coomer!" but Twitter does not have an edit button as they, like the prostitute, also delight in leaving their users unsatisfied. End thread.
